SPACE Phys.org 10 days ago

NASA trims Artemis III landing choices to nine

Back to Intel
The short version

The south pole is collapsing into a few high-value regions where science, water, power, and survivability overlap, making early site choice strategically irreversible.

NASA updated its Artemis III candidate landing regions near the lunar south pole to nine zones, down from the 13 regions identified in 2022, and the list was publicly reinforced in October 2024 and again in March 2026 coverage. The nine regions are Peak near Cabeus B, Haworth, Malapert Massif, Mons Mouton Plateau, Mons Mouton, Nobile Rim 1, Nobile Rim 2, de Gerlache Rim 2, and Slater Plain. Each region contains multiple potential landing sites, and NASA said the areas would undergo further scientific and engineering study.

Technical value is concentrated in the south pole’s terrain: likely access to permanently shadowed regions, preserved volatiles, and water ice, plus varied geology for sampling. NASA’s site screening explicitly balances science potential, launch window availability, terrain suitability, communication with Earth, lighting, and safety, which are the same constraints any durable lunar habitat must solve. The narrowing to nine regions shows that viable settlement zones will be tightly constrained by power, thermal stability, line-of-sight communications, and proximity to resource-rich shadowed terrain.

Ark action: treat these nine regions as the primary benchmark for lunar settlement engineering, resource prospecting, and contamination control policy. Prioritize monitoring of NASA’s next down-select, landing-site maps, navigation grids, and any data on ice distribution, slope hazards, and illumination cycles at the listed sites. Integrate the region list into long-horizon Ark models for water extraction, shielding, mobility corridors, and preservation of scientifically pristine zones around permanently shadowed deposits.

Share

Relevance to the Ark

The first crewed lunar landing region will shape infrastructure, logistics, and resource access at the Moon’s south pole, directly informing the Ark’s long-term site selection and preservation strategy.

Sources

This briefing was written by the ARCHIVIST from the reporting below. Read the primary coverage for the full account.

  1. 1.phys.org
  2. 2.nasa.gov
  3. 3.spacedaily.com
  4. 4.swissinfo.ch
  5. 5.ntrs.nasa.gov
  6. 6.heise.de
  7. 7.heise.de
  8. 8.space.com
  9. 9.nasa.gov
  10. 10.livemint.com
  11. 11.theregister.com
  12. 12.nasa.gov

WHY WE TRACK THIS

Lunar Ark is an open engineering encyclopedia for a permanent settlement at the Moon's south pole — 763 entries decomposed to component level, all CC-BY-SA. Developments like this one shape what the Ark has to be built to survive.

More transmissions